Marc Ward posted an interesting article on his blog at the year's end involving a recent piercing the corporate veil decision in a U.S. District Court in Georgia. The issue did not involve liability, but the venue of the dispute. The Court decided in Rayonier Wood Products, LLC v. ScanWare, Inc. that although the shareholder was not a signatory to the contract at issue, it was still bound by the terms of the contract, including the choice of law provision limiting venue to the Georgia court. As a result, the Finnish company shareholder was forced to litigate the dispute in Georgia. We recently discussed forum selection clauses on Virginia Business Law Update, and noted the advantages to Virginia businesses of litigating in their home state. This case is another example of the importance of such a provision when dealing with foreign business partners.
PCT Law Group Blog
Minority Shareholder Bound to Contract Venue Provision It Didn't Sign
Friday, January 15, 2010 by PCT Law Group
Recent Posts
- Virginia Federal Jury Rules on Virginia Tech Equal Pay Case
- FLSA Compliance for Company's Unpaid Interns
- Who Owns Newly-Created IP within a University Community?
- $3 Million Personal Injury Claim Against Virginia Business Dismissed
- Federal Employee's Discrimination & Retaliation Claims Dismissed
- Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals: Employer May be Liable for Harassment by Customer
- Non-Compete Ruled Unenforceable by Virginia Circuit Court
- Alexandria Federal Court Transfers Venue to California in Patent Infringement Suit
- US Supreme Court: Title VII's Antiretaliation Provision Covers Third Parties
- Virginia Federal Court: 'Twiqbal' Standard Doesn't Apply To Affirmative Defenses
Tags
Malik Cutlar Employment Law Intellectual Property Scott Johnson Corporate Angela France Tom Jackson Government Contracts Ray Millien Litigation

Post a Comment